Search for: "CH v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 3:57 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Les Laboratoires Servier & Anor v Apotex Inc & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 593 (03 May 2012) Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 570 (03 May 2012) Medeva BV v Comptroller General of Patents [2012] EWCA Civ 523 (03 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Crim 901 (02 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Calver, R (on the… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d § 3.142; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 2, § 2.07, Ch. 3, § 3.30.] ■ Jasmine Orberg, Applicant v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Legal Services Commission v Rasool [2008] EWCA Civ 154 (05 March 2008) Revenue & Customs v Dunwood Travel Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 174 (07 March 2008) AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 175 (07 March 2008) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWCA Civ 153 (06 March 2008) City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 156 (06 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bright,… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
Hofstra University Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYFamily Law Questions of Fact of Church as Husband's Alter Ego Permit Its Appraisal in Divorce CH v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German design law on the… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
In Ireland, the common law rule in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269 was to the same effect; it had come to be undergirded by considerations emanating from the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights; and these considerations are likewise appropriate in the interpretation of section 33. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:26 am by Broc Romanek
The Court cited with approval the Court of Chancery's decision in Pershing Square, LP v. [read post]