Search for: "CHAMBERS V INTERIOR" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 11:10 pm
Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court has rendered a decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Thumbing nose at Hill, Interior Dept. moves to tribalize native Hawaiians by decree [Ilya Shapiro, NACRP, related PDF, Hawaii Free Press, also, background] Cellphone 911: “Safety Mandates That May Reduce Safety” [Coyote] Liability-expanding California decision: knowing breach of a material contractual provision may trigger state False Claims Act [Sidley] Plus Chamber’s ILR on state False Claims Acts and more; Feds to GM: write smoking-gun memos for trial… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
  This international criminal law doctrine remained stable until an Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) abruptly announced in Prosecutor v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:16 pm by team
On October 12th 2010, the same chamber found  in decision SARL Comptoir aixois des viandes v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-54 Title: Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 2:12 am
 Is practice in Europe the same as that articulated in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group, or is there a spread of practices, in which case it will be good to know which approach will be adopted when we have a single European unitary patent, construed by the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:25 am by John L. Welch
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Hot Springs National Park v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
A good example is Case C‑387/12, Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesgerichtshof, the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which had to address a set of the sort of facts that crop up surprisingly often in real life but which generally don't get litigated on account of the expense, inconvenience and uncertainty inherent in them.Back in February 2003 Uwe Spoering, a photographer, took… [read post]