Search for: "CHAMBERS v. BROWN" Results 81 - 100 of 535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by Ted Frank
" [Freddoso on ALI Restatement] Steven Levitt predicts 80 extra homicides a year from Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Nadav Orian Peer, University of Colorado Law School, has posted Money Creation and Bank Clearing, which is forthcoming in the Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law.ICYMI:  Marcia Coyle on Justice Kagan’s reluctant duel with Justice Gorsuch on “law-chambers history” of habeas corpus in Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
"For whatever reason, they could not bring themselves to do what they were about to tell the American people that they had to do" seven years later in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am by Marty Lederman
  The two December cases are Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
First Derivative Traders; and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
A (Appellant) v Essex County Council & National Autistic Society (Intervener) [2010] UKSC 33 Supreme Court (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke) July 14 2010 The right to education under Article 2 Protocol 1 of the Convention was not breached by the delay in catering for the special educational needs of a child. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Much has been written over the past weeks about the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Uber v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Chertoff (06-1717), involving the rate at which paralegal services should be compensated for prevailing parties awarded attorneys’ fees, and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:50 am by Rob
AB 559 would modify a rule denounced by the California Supreme Court (Chavez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Amber Melville-Brown is a partner at Withersworldwide specialisting in reputation management. [read post]