Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. PHILLIPS" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Kenneth Rose, Stephen Phillips, Rory Thomson, Morag McClelland, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Tobias Seger and Emma Boffey, all from CMS Scotland. 1604: That ends proceedings for today. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
Rule 27.9 requires a recording to be made of a hearing in open court of proceedings pending in the High Court, and in other proceedings at the Lord Chancellor’s direction. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
VC Glasscock’s Fair Value Determination in Wright v Phillips Wright v Phillips, C.A. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
UCLA law prof Stephen Bainbridge revealed an internal email sent by the school’s chancellor to all faculty. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The constitution of this Court excited Merpel who, being a female Kat, is also something of a feminist: sitting with the sole male judge (the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Terence Etherton) were two Ladies Justices of Appeal, Lady Justice Hallett and Lady Justice Sharp. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am by Roy Black
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
: On August 19, 2013, in connection with its entry into a settlement with New York-based hedge fund adviser Phillip Falcone and his advisory firm Harbinger Capital Partners, the SEC for the first time implemented its new policy requiring defendants seeking to settle civil enforcement actions to admit wrongdoing, in contrast to the long-standing practice of allowing defendants to resolve the enforcement actions with a “neither-admit-nor-deny” settlement. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
There appears, however, to be some form of ‘aggressive tax avoidance’ which chancellor Osborne and prime minister Cameron regard as ‘morally repugnant’. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:01 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This wasn't a close case.United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]