Search for: "CHANEY v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 3:10 am
Chaney's motion was denied, and no appeal was taken from that ruling. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:29 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Joinder; relevant evidence In separate Criminal Complaints, the State charged Donald Lee Cooper with the first-degree intentional homicide of Eugene Chaney, as party to a crime, and with the kidnapping and aggravated battery of Leoporium Ford, as party to a crime. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion for mistrial — Mention of stolen car On January 7, 2015, Scott Murphy and Jonathan Hradsky reported to the Prince George’s County Police that they had been robbed, at gunpoint, by two men. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 3:33 am
The plaintiffs have had good luck here: not only did Judge Victoria Chaney consolidate wildly... [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by Cynthia L. May
       Laws prohibiting discrimination trump patient preference regarding the race of health care providers, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled in Chaney v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Fifteen state attorneys general have signed this letter to US AG Eric Holder, asking him to appeal the atrocious decision of the US District Court in DC in Beaty v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:56 am by Sheldon Toplitt
A 19-year-old Univ. of Georgia freshman has sued the school district where she attended high school and a school administrator for $2 million in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for using a bikini-clad Facebook image of her in a county-wide educational seminar without her permission.In Chelsea Chaney v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
As an additional penalty, the court required that Appellant pay restitution in the amount of $955.Although no objection was made to the restitution order and notwithstanding Appellant immediately, at the sentencing hearing, paid the restitution, Appellant now complains that the order constitutes an illegal sentence because (1) the recipient was neither a victim nor a proper restitution payee, and (2) no evidence was introduced regarding the amount of restitution.Referring to Chaney… [read post]