Search for: "CHANNEL v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2017, 11:00 am
In Janvey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:51 pm
Halleck, SCOTUS held that the private non-profit corporation designated by New York City to manage state-required public-access cable channels was not a state actor, so not subject to First Amendment limitations in banning a speaker from the channels. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:27 pm
Channell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
Consortium v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 9:50 am
Regina (Barclay and Others) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and Others Court of Appeal “Proposed reform of the constitution of the Channel Island of Sark which allowed the Seneschal, appointed by the Seigneur, to be both a member of the legislature and the chief judge, contravened article 6 of the European Convention on [...] [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck New York state law requires cable operators to set aside channels on their cable systems for public access. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
Unlike most CFAA cases, RyanAir DAC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:46 am
R (Barclay and others) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2009] UKSC 9; [2009] WLR (D) 349 "The presence of two unelected non-voting members in the legislature of the Channel Island of Sark, which had 28 democratically elected voting members, did not contravene art 3 of the First Protocol to [...] [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Writing for the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
In Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 677, the Court of Appeal considered whether countervailing privacy and the public interest/freedom of expression rights had been properly balanced, together with the appropriate award of privacy damages arising from footage of an eviction shown on Channel 5, the Defendant in this action. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, involves whether private operators of public access channels are state actors subject to constitutional liability under the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:27 pm
MNN stresses that the idea that public-access channels are public forums is based on a 1996 opinion by now-retired Justice Anthony Kennedy in Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:22 am
Rosenberger v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:59 am
Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and Others Supreme Court "The presence of two unelected, non-voting members in the legislature of the Channel Island of Sark which had 28 voting members democratically elected by an electorate of under 500 was not incompatible with article 3 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, [...] [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
When SCOTUS decided Halleck last term and held that a private company managing public-access cable channels is not a state actor, it was obvious that this meant online platforms such as YouTube or Twitter. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Litigation of Investor Claims: State v. [read post]
