Search for: "CHAVEZ v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
John, Harvard University Cybelle Fox, University of California, Berkeley Commentator: William J. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:58 am
Santa Monica and Chavez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:38 am
Here are the materials in Chavez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
(Michael Robinson Chavez) Nearly 1 in 3 homeowners with a mortgage in L.A. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am
AMICUS CURIAE LETTERS: Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP Consumer Attorneys of California California Employment Lawyers Association California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO Chavez & Gertler LLP Daniels, Fine, Israel, Schonbuch & Lebovits LLP Desai Law Firm, P.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
See Chavez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Gertler of Chavez & Gertler LLP, and moderator John S. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
• What is left to find out on the California and federal levels? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am
2011 WL 5008008, at *3.There’s also Stevens v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
In my opinion, that holding (like the holding in Chavez) is inconsistent with the California Supreme Court's decision in Cel-Tech. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
Mark V. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:32 pm
The Legislature passed AB 559 to overturn Chavez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
AB 559 would modify a rule denounced by the California Supreme Court (Chavez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:35 am
Chavez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Parkinson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Gertler of Chavez & Gertler) Thursday, June 9, 2011, 12:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.: Bar Association of San Francisco, Disability Rights Committee of the Equality Committee, "Anatomy of a Systemic Class Action Impact Lawsuit" (the program will cover class certification issues in Unruh Civil Rights Act class actions, such as National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:29 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE KARENA WHERRY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
As previously discussed here, Avritt disapproved of Tobacco II’s holding that absent class members are excused from establishing individual reliance on misrepresentations which form the basis of a UCL claim.In Chavez v. [read post]
