Search for: "CHRYSLER CORPORATION V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 8:39 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday dismissed [order list, PDF] the final challenge to the sale of Chrysler Group assets to Italian automaker Fiat [corporate websites]. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Troubled corporations have made increasing use of the quick-sale option - under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code - and thus have avoided the more investor-protective provisions of Chapter 11. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Florida's Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of these corporate giants at the expense of the injured in the case of Rosado v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
The petition in Center for Auto Safety, et al., v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Graham v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm
This case is, Chrysler Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
(Abay v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:11 am
So I can say with confidence that the actions of Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company (DCIC) in Abay v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
In the case of Chestnut v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:55 am
In the case of Chestnut v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
Heco v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:31 am
(See Goldfarb v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:37 am
In Abay v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Daimler Chrysler Corp. and Khulumani v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 8:53 pm
It seems increasingly likely that GM will follow Chrysler into bankruptcy: GM recently announced that it would pay its trade creditors five days earlier than usual, which looks like an attempt to settle up with trade creditors before the filing.There has also been some discussion of using the Chrysler "quick sale" approach in connection with GM. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:46 am
We corporate and securities law types rarely get to play in the rarified air of The Constitution, so we are awaiting eagerly the Supreme Court's decision in Free Enterprise Fund v PCAOB, in which the argument is whether the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley governing the selection of members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board violate the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:38 am
Chrysler Corp, 106 F.R.D. 364, 366 (D.R.I. 1985); Evans v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:50 am
Ross to stop this abhorrent practice by DCIC: Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company’s objectionable auto insurance policy came to light in a case that was recently before the Michigan Supreme Court, Abay v. [read post]
