Search for: "CIR Law Offices" Results 41 - 60 of 7,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Shea Denning
City of Wyoming, __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 1533998 (6th Cir. 2016) (officer’s placing of his foot in the door during a knock and talk to briefly prevent the door from closing followed by his removal of the foot and the closing of the door did not violate clearly established law). [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Shea Denning
City of Wyoming, __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 1533998 (6th Cir. 2016) (officer’s placing of his foot in the door during a knock and talk to briefly prevent the door from closing followed by his removal of the foot and the closing of the door did not violate clearly established law). [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 3:18 pm
Nightingale Home Health Care, Inc. (5th Cir. 7/23/07) [pdf] the Court held that you look at both damage caps and apply the one that provides the lowest amount of punitive damages. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
On the one hand, I am fairly wary of awarding attorney's fees to defendants in civil rights cases, and the law properly reflects that position. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm by Jeffrey Brown
"Also, because of the potential for wiping the phone - whether locally or remotely, "it is imperative that law enforcement officers have the authority to immediately 'search' or retrieve, incident to a valid arrest, information from a pager in order to prevent its destruction as evidence. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:24 pm by Jim Gerl
This is another post in our series which is an introduction to special education law. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Here, James informed Officer Michael Brewton that law enforcement could search the vehicle he was driving. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Jim Gerl
  397 F.3d 77, 42 IDELR 230 (2d Cir. 2/2/05), the Second Circuit ruled that an IDEA hearing officer has the authority to review IEP safety concerns. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:11 am
United States, 757 F.2d 971, 979 (9th Cir. 1985) (law enforcement officers have "obligations, such as the duty to execute warrants, which private citizens lack; those obligations make the law of the citizen arrests an inappropriate instrument for determining FTCA liability"); Caban v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:35 am by tortsprof
In a case of first impression at the circuit level, the Third Circuit ruled that TSA screeners are not law enforcement officers under the Federal Tort Claims Act; claims related to their conduct are barred by sovereign immunity: In a... [read post]