Search for: "CJ v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
[A]t least some states have Article III standing. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
Co., No CJ-2013-1243 (Okla. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am
As to preliminary references, there were three rulings in 2022 concerning trademarks and one on designs (C-421/20, Acacia v BMW). [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm
Vardy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:32 am
Harper, I wrote about the possibility that the Court might think about extending the approach in the CJ Rehnquist’s Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 9:39 am
Gore concurrence on statutory interpretation, which CJ Rehnquist authored, be in considering the role of state courts in interpreting the… Continue reading The post Addressing a Key Issue Discussed at Length in Moore v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:17 am
CJ-2017-7301 (Okla. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am
Even the Court’s newest liberal, CJ Roberts, isn’t a fan of affirmative action. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:30 pm
According to the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, work-related psychiatric injuries are only compensable if your employer is liable for the injury. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm
In this regard, it is worth noting that two justices from the Kiefel CJ plurality – Kiefel CJ and Keane J – will be retiring from the bench in the near future (Keane J in October 2022 and Kiefel CJ in January 2024). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm
In this regard, it is worth noting that two justices from the Kiefel CJ plurality – Kiefel CJ and Keane J – will be retiring from the bench in the near future (Keane J in October 2022 and Kiefel CJ in January 2024). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
The High Court considered these issues in Farm Transparency v New South Wales, handing down its judgment this month. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 10:20 am
The CJ agreed. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
That view cannot, so it seems to me, survive the opening words of FPR 27.11, which expressly state that the right granted to journalists is to attend a hearing held in private. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:19 am
The post CJ Burger On Supreme Court Leaks in <I>NY Times v. [read post]
