Search for: "CLARKSON v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  The quizmaster had these three: Goodwin v NGN (Sir Fred Goodwin) , WER v REW (Christopher Hutcheson) and AMM v HXV (Jeremy Clarkson). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by Ruth Bonino
Key cases to look out for in 2012 Default Retirement Age and age discrimination (Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes being heard with Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police). [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm by NL
She was accommodated at a property called Trayfoot Lodge but after a year, in March 2009, she was moved to a property called Clarkson House. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm by NL
She was accommodated at a property called Trayfoot Lodge but after a year, in March 2009, she was moved to a property called Clarkson House. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Tugendhat J agreed an order which discontinued the privacy action brought by Jeremy Clarkson against his ex-wife – previously known as AMM v HXW (with a public judgment [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB)). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:52 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Tesla Motors, Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am by Michael Scutt
 Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes was about age discrimination and it not being illegal to make partners retire at 65. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:44 am by traceydennis
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 899; [2010] WLR (D) 206  ”A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]