Search for: "CLASS v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2020, 6:31 am
In Sung Gon Kang v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:39 am
In Carrera v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:20 pm
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/HowToFileRetaliationComplaint.htm The post Andrews v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Jesse v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
They alleged: (1) improper phone calls to class members using an auto-dialer; (2) calling people who were on the national do-not-call registry; or (3) calling people who were on the defendant’s internal do-not-call list. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
Author: Jarod Bona When you defend antitrust class actions in federal court like we do, you often see a long list of state antitrust claims brought by what are called indirect purchasers. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:33 am
Eager v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Ct. 1740 (2011), defendant Nordstrom, revised its employee handbook to preclude class actions. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:11 pm
Moody v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Marquez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:00 am
N.Y. 12/17/20), the court dismissed a proposed class action alleging that the defendant improperly labelled its vanilla almond milk product finding that the company did not mislead consumers with the product’s vanilla flavor label. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
On a question of first impression in the Fourth Circuit, McAdams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Williams v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:28 pm
In Damasco v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
We don't see many successful applications of preemption with respect to 510k, Class II medical devices since Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:51 am
In its recent opinion, Reliable Money Order, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant in administrative class action is entitled to discovery from the plaintiff’s social media accounts. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:40 pm
Zyburo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
No commonality due to multiple defendants, multiple state laws, and plaintiff-specific variations. [read post]