Search for: "CLASS v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:53 am
In Smallwood v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
” Blough v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 am
Courts are permitting defendants more frequently to offer expert testimony in opposition to class certification. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 am
Courts are permitting defendants more frequently to offer expert testimony in opposition to class certification. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am
Here is a summary of Judge Gorsuch’s class certification and CAFA opinions: Shook v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
(3) Did defendant waive its right to compel arbitration? [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
In Roth v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:49 pm
In Eddlemon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Judge Brown, relying on the until-now latest No Fly List case, Ibrahim v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:51 am
Case Citation: Moore v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Scott v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 5:31 am
Mortgage v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 7:05 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly found that felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c is a class A felony, rather than an unclassified felony. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
The US Supreme Court made this task easier for attorneys defending antitrust class actions in the 2013 classic antitrust case of Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:58 am
This Court’s decision applies the state standards surrounding the PAGA and joins a growing list of opinions finding Concepcion inapplicable in the California wage and hour class action contex. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:36 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Travis Anderson In Sky Sports, Inc. v. [read post]