Search for: "CLAYTON V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:09 pm
See Pate v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
Clayton County The Guidance also addresses the expansion of Title VII’s coverage concerning sex and gender under Bostock v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:33 pm
From Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:58 am
In the 2020 US Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
” The rulemaking petition says that the 2023 decision in Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
” On cross-examination, Clayton stated that “brakes were working normal when I road tested it. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
But because he agreed with the government that the merger was likely to harm competition “in at least some relevant markets”–that is, on some of the specific city-to-city routes among the hundreds identified in the government’s complaint–he ruled it a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm
Collington v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
Section 7 of the Clayton Act prohibits mergers that harm competition in “in any line” of commerce. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
See United States v. [read post]
