Search for: "CLINE" Results 1 - 20 of 919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 3:20 pm by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Walla Walla Community College, a PERC Examiner ruled that a college administrator was to be excluded from the bargaining unit representing rank and file higher education staff. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:06 pm by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families, a PERC Examiner dismissed a complaint alleging AFSCME breach of its duty of fair representation (DFR) when failed to facilitate a request for information. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 pm by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In City of Seattle, [City of Seattle, Decision 137535-A (PECB, 2024)] the PERC Commission overturned an errant Examiner ruling and held that the complaining employee suffered an “adverse action” upon which a discrimination claim could be made when he was placed on administrative leave with pay pending an investigation. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
  Tickets also sold at Willow Park Mercantile & Rivertown Treasure Chest in Downtown Antioch CA Participating Local Wineries & Merchants: Hannah Nicole Vineyards – Willow Park Merchants Cline Family Cellars – Almost There Travel Bloomfield Winery – Rivertown Treasure Chest Campos Vineyards – Royal Banquet and Event Hall Viano Winery – Renu Salon Oakridge Winery – K911kitty rescue D’Art Winery – Flying Dutchman Tattoo Nostra Vita… [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:59 pm by admin
By Jim Cline & Peter Haller In Bethel School District, Examiner Whitney partially dismissed a complaint that alleged that the Employer had engaged in direct dealing even though it had directly proposed a plan to employees without union representation present and misreported the status of the meetings to the union. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:38 pm by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Hubert Gilmore v Teamsters 839, a Benton County corrections officer filed a ULP complaint against his Union alleging that it breached its duty of fair representation when it declined to pursue a grievance related to a newly adopted agreement that affected shift hours. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:39 am by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Maxson v Baldwin, an Ohio deputy sheriff sued his ex-Employer after he was discharged following a guilty plea to the misdemeanor of attempting to illegally fill an opioid prescription and testing positive for marijuana. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:24 am by admin
By Jim Cline In our recent newsletters we discussed the extension of arbitration to emergency dispatchers (Newsletter 4/26/24). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:48 am by admin
By Jim Cline In the last newsletter, we discussed that the Washington legislature has extended binding interest arbitration rights to emergency dispatchers. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by admin
By Jim Cline In a decision using scorching language in Snohomish County, Examiner Leonard entirely dismissed all 11 claims the Snohomish County Corrections Guild filed against Snohomish County. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:41 am by admin
By Jim Cline In Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Examiner Elizabeth Snyder found that the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Employer) unilaterally changed working conditions for two Washington Federation of State Employees (Union) employees when it removed their new positions from the bargaining unit. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:34 am by admin
By Jim Cline In City of Seattle, Examiner Christopher Casillas dismissed a complaint after finding the Complainant failed to satisfy each element necessary for a discrimination prima facie case. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 2:55 pm by admin
By Jim Cline The latest inflation numbers raises further questions about whether the CPI will continue to decline quickly below 3% as had been predicted. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by admin
By Jim Cline In Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Examiner Casillas dismissed the case, holding that Complainant failed to prove her employer had discriminated against her for engaging in a protected activity. [read post]