Search for: "CM v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:39 am
The United States, in which the Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) could include contract clauses that deviated from federal government commercial contracting rules. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:39 am
The United States, in which the Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) could include contract clauses that deviated from federal government commercial contracting rules. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:09 am
Complaint: The United States of America v James J. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
In this post, Jen Knibbs, an associate at CMS, comments on Croydon LBC v Kalonga [2022] UKSC 7, an important decision on whether a landlord can terminate a flexible tenancy agreement before the expiry of the fixed term if the tenancy agreement does not expressly provide for re-entry or forfeiture. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am
In this post, Madison Ingram, Trainee Solicitor in the ICE Disputes team at CMS previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Potanina v Potanin. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
In this case comment, Jana Blahova and Imtiyaz Chowdhury, both trainee solicitors with CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16, which concerned whether parts of the Secretary of State’s guidance on the investment of Local Government Pensions Schemes relating to… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:10 am
Melvin Isaac v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:30 pm
On 13 October 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy) [2021] UKSC 44. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Alex Askew of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, which concerned whether a representative data protection action seeking damages for loss of control of personal data could be brought on behalf of large numbers of unidentifiable class members. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:46 am
In Kane v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
On October 4, 2011 in Izgel Medical Services, PLLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:44 pm
Philbrick v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:44 pm
Philbrick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
In this post, James Warshaw, an associate in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, previews the decision which is expected to be handed down tomorrow, 1 July 2020, in the matter of R v Hilton (Northern Ireland). [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:14 pm
In an opinion expanding the scope of federal criminal liability for “insider trading,” a two-Member majority of the Second Circuit affirmed several securities and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:18 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Medicare recipient could not prevent CMS from recovering conditional payments from a liability settlement by holding that the NJ Collateral Source Statute (NJCSS) did not prevent Medicare from recovering medical expenses as part of her damages in a tort suit and that the state court's oder apportioning settlement proceeds did not bar the Federal government from seeking reimbursement for medical expenses.Taransky v Sec of… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:38 pm
Texas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:11 am
See Uhm v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:39 am
In this post, Sophie Malley, a trainee solicitor at CMS, comments on the decision in Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and Anor [2022] UKSC 19, the first product liability case to reach the UK Supreme Court. [read post]