Search for: "CO John Doe 2" Results 21 - 40 of 3,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court's ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor's spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband such that… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:13 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
For starters, let’s say that John Doe is charged with possession of a firearm when he is pulled over by police late one night. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:56 pm by Pamela
To illustrate, let’s assume you add John Smith as a 10% shareholder of your practice. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:03 pm by Michael Lowe
This does happen: just last week former New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin filed his appeal of his federal conviction on similar corruption charges. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Baylor Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, p. 368, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor’s spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor’s spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband… [read post]