Search for: "COMPUTER CACHE V INTEL CORP"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Swimways Corp., 2014 WL 2006799 (D. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District Court N D… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Those companies are sometimes referred to as “trolls,” a phrase coined by a former Intel Corp. executive. [read post]
