Search for: "CONCEPCION v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 11:30 am by Paul Karlsgodt
Div. 2011), in which a New Jersey state appellate court held an arbitration provision unenforceable under state law on ambiguity grounds. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:58 am by Mark Tabakman
  Now, a New Jersey federal judge has applied Concepcion to dismiss a FLSA class action and has sent the case to be arbitrated instead. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
There's another twist though: such class arbitration waivers are "unconscionable and therefore unenforceable under New Jersey (state) law. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm
There's another twist though: such class arbitration waivers are "unconscionable and therefore unenforceable under New Jersey (state) law. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:31 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Cellco Partnership, the Third Circuit held that New Jersey decision holding class arbitration waivers unconscionable was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
 The Third Circuit also noted that a New Jersey choice of law provision only applied to the agreement to the extent it was consistent with the FAA. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  Indeed, if the Court simply applies the language of the FAA, and doesn’t invent new rules of federal law for the purpose of wiping away state law, then the decision should not be significant at all. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:18 am by Mark J. Levin and John L. Culhane, Jr.
Concepcion held that such arbitration agreements are valid and enforceable under the FAA even if state public policy would prohibit them. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:09 pm by Christopher G. Ward
In response, several states (including Maryland, New Jersey, Vermont and Washington) have recently passed laws prohibiting companies from requiring employees to give up the right to a jury trial for claims of sexual harassment. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm by Sam Eichner
New Jersey, the Court held that a higher level of scrutiny ought to be applied to cases where the modification of a government’s own contractual obligations was at issue. [read post]