Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al." Results 101 - 120 of 3,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am by Alfred Brophy
Described in depth in Section V, it also emerges from the multi-disciplinary framework of social healing through justice Professor Yamamoto has been developing for guiding and assessing practical reconciliation initiatives. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al., No. 14-1513 (enhanced damages) (linked to Stryker) Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Cohen et al, No. 06-10145 (12-26-07). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
The rule finalizes EPA's finding that the trading programs in the Transport Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), achieve greater reasonable progress towards the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas than source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) in those states covered by the Transport Rule [See WIMS 6/7/12]. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited (see Part I for background, Part II for the ruling and an easy summary). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:12 am by Charles Sartain
It is no surprise to Texas Supreme Court watchers that in Energy Transfer Partners et al v. [read post]