Search for: "CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES CORPORATION v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Exceptions may apply, including for stock repurchases: occurring in connection with certain non-taxable corporate reorganizations; by regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts; not exceeding $1 million in aggregate during the taxable year; and to the extent treated as a dividend. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
This paper summarizes the academic literature that empirically studied the relationship among the macroeconomy, taxes, and individuals’ behavioral responses to rate cuts or rate increases both in the United States and abroad. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
The agreement provided that upon satisfaction of the conditions of the agreement, the City would convey the property to Laurel Place and provide it with a loan, and Laurel Place would construct the housing units. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Amato , No. 06-5600, 06-5741, 07-2152, 07-2311 Convictions and sentences for series of frauds against several states and a corporation are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) refusing to grant a new trial based on the government's alleged withholding of impeachment material and newly discovered exculpatory evidence; 2) refusing to sever defendants' trials; 3) improperly instructing the jury as to the meaning of "false statements" and… [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
Oman's brief (this post continues below the document): Ralph Oman's Amicus Curiae Brief in Oracle v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:55 am
BPRH was organized to acquire, refurbish and lease recently-constructed, previously-owned single-family homes on a large scale in select markets in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
I am of course referring to United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
At stake here is whether the FCC should open a rulemaking to consider changes to program rules governing fiber construction. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
State Bank of Bellingham v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
