Search for: "CONSTRUCTION RESOURCES CORP. v. COURTS, LTD."
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High… [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 6:53 pm
Although the Court in Blencoe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 9:06 pm
A more recent decision in Valve Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
Norges Bank also announced its decision to place Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd under observation due to an unacceptable risk that the company is contributing to or is itself responsible for gross corruption. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks),… [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Dutra Construction Company, 543 U.S. 481 (2005). [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
OG Property Owner Corp., which is developing the 1,600-acre Wilder project just east of the Caldecott Tunnel, has agreed to pay the Regional Water Quality Control Board $530,000 to resolve a 2009 complaint that violated its construction permit and state water regulations including the Clean Water Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Calvert Group, LTD, No. 07-1680 (4th Cir. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Electronic Scriptorium Ltd., No. 07-1892 (4th Cir. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IP Business Strategy Blog) Global - Copyright LegalTorrents – ‘online community created to discover and distribute CC licensed digital media’: (creativecommons.org), WIPO workshop to probe copyright issues arising from the preservation of digital content: (WIPO), Jeff Roberts on avatar rights: (IPKat) Events 16 July: US LSI ‘Patent claim construction workshop’ – Seattle: (Patent Docs), 16-17 July: EPO… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: Lupin v Abbott Labs: (FDA Law Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Apotex sues FDA to recover 180-day exclusivity on generic Plavix: (Orange Book Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Former Bristol-Myers Squibb executive charged over lying about Plavix deal struck with rival Apotex: (Managing Intellectual Property), Risperdal (Resperidone) – US: Apotex files motion to intervene in relisting of Risperdal patent case; Teva quickly files opposition: Teva… [read post]
