Search for: "CONSUMERS FINANCING CORPORATION v. Lamb" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
The corporation's failure to give 60-days notice before issuing the dividend did not make it impossible for plaintiffs to comply with the trustee demand exception.Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: There have been other books on the Burger Court — books written by Tinsley Yarbrough and ones edited by the likes of Vincent Blasi, Charles Lamb and Stephen Halpern, and Herman Schwartz. [read post]