Search for: "CORP. COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
This basically means that the federal court has the power to hear a civil case where the persons that are parties to the action are "diverse" in citizenship (citizens of different states) or non-U.S. citizens. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) issued on April 16, 2020 two orders[1] largely denying requests for rehearing of its prior decisions that, among other things, subjected to minimum offer price thresholds energy resources participating in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
Electric Power Supply Association, and EnerNOC Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Thus, your lesser (state) power can't force me/my client to do something else or punish me/my client for doing what federal power demands. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Cf., National Federation of Independent Businesses v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
In Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am
” And those concerns, the company argues, conflict with the Atomic Energy Act, which gives the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission exclusive power to regulate uranium milling and tailings-management activities. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Their argument is based on an unpublished NJ Appellate Division decision, Bass v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
He cited two court decisions touching on this issue — Chrysler Corp and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal’s 1981 decision in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co v Friedman (24 EPD ¶31,457). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court called Quill Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
International Finance Corp., 17-1011, a caption cool enough to name the offspring of at least three Brooklyn hipsters. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Fined for Violating the Clean Water Act. - Dave Bary, EPA, February 12, 2010 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has fined the Roberson Oil Company, Inc. of Ada, Oklahoma, $3,693 for violating federal Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulations outlined under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
E.g., Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
