Search for: "COSTA v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 61 - 80
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
COSTAS, Debtors. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Contra Costa Cty. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:30 am
Superior Court. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 893, 937-38.) [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
Superior Court in which the S. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
Reversing the Contra Costa County Superior Court's summary judgment in favor of Metson, the Court of Appeal's analysis of the on call time distinguished the two subcategories of on call time. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
Cowett of California Superior Court in San Diego ruled that Starbucks must provide restitution, with interest, of over $100 million. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
County of Contra Costa (2018) 22 Cal.App.5th 214.) [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Jepson held that rent repayment orders cannot be made against a superior landlord (for example in a ‘rent to rent’ situation) but this case is due to be appealed to the Supreme Court next year. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
On March 17, 2009, the First Superior Court of the First Judicial District of Panama affirmed a ruling for lack of jurisdiction in Sara Grant Tobal et al v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Curry, a Los Angeles County Superior Court jury convicted Mr. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:59 am
The recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 11:40 pm
Judge Susan Illston found that there was "some evidence of dangerousness" in the BPH decision: There was sufficient evidence for the state superior court to uphold the BPH's decision. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
’” (Costa v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
A Santa Clara County Superior Court jury convicted Mr. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 8), while they have also reigned in the record’s scope by holding the statute does not abrogate or impliedly repeal the law of privilege. [read post]
