Search for: "CP v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:17 pm
Another potentially helpful case is Wakefern Food v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:08 pm
CPS Security Solutions, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Steelpoint CP Holdings, LLC, C.A. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Disposal As above, the respondent (CPS)’s arguments found favour with the majority, such that TRA is capable of coming within CJA 1988, s 134 despite not having a “State” position at the relevant time. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Blondin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:52 am
From Garner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Scheer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm
Issue NAFTA Chapter 20 USMCA Chapter 31 Scope: Issues Subject to Chapter 20/31 Dispute Settlement Covers all state-to-state disputes (except trade remedies (Chapter 19)) over: a) interpretation, b) violations, or c) nullification or impairment of NAFTA. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:38 am
C. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Reese v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
As a result of Nohr v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
CPS Security Solutions, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
Rejecting this, the Information Commissioner stated that the CPS confirmed that it had the information and that the legal note prepared 17 years ago is still current. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
” The Data Protection Report notes that Nevada, New York and other states are following California’s CCPA. [read post]
8 May 2019, 6:48 am
Jackson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Highlighting the Law Commission’s consultation paper Law Commission: Simplification of the Immigration Rules; CP 242, 21 January 2019, Lord Lloyd-Jones lamented that “the structure of both primary and secondary legislation in this field has reached such a degree of complexity that there is an urgent need to make the law and procedure clear and comprehensible. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:37 am
The joint SFO and CPS Code of Practice in relation to DPAs does not, however, refer to waiver of privilege as a factor weighing in favour of a DPA, only that (among other factors) “the prosecutor needs to establish whether sufficient information about the operation and conduct of P has been supplied in order to assess whether P has been co-operative. [read post]
