Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2008, 9:00 pm
If you have been following the recent opinions concerning meal period and rest period class actions, you might also want to follow the progress in Savaglio v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
Furthermore, the cross-claimants declined to file a brief in this appeal, the court noted. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
A case decided yesterday by the California Court of Appeal, People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
Unlike the first appeal, the Court awarded its costs to Nicholas Labs. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:23 pm
Woody’s Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:51 am
The appeals court will probably be far more receptive than the lower court to certain fundamental concerns. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
The cross-appeal has now been terminated based on the parties' motions.On Thursday, Samsung moved to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
This week, the New York Times wrote a short article informing its readers of the case that is going before the United States Supreme Court out of California, Martel v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:06 am
Fireside Bank v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
Superior Court (California Capital Insurance Company) (October 29, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two) was called upon to determine whether the alleged failure of an insurance company to adequately pay a loss claim was actionable in light of Insurance Code section 790.03 et seq., Moradi-Shalal v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
California, tests the outer limit of the right to confront a witness.The Indiana case was Hammon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:51 am
And it's important to remind people that, especially if (as here) both the trial court and -- even on appeal -- the California Attorney General's Office believe otherwise. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:06 am
On cross-appeal, the panel held that Pauma was not entitled to seek redress under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act because the State and Pauma actually reached a gaming Compact. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:00 am
On Appeal: The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:52 pm
Becerra will be an appeal to the Ninth Circuit by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:09 am
USC's procedures didn't fairly treat the accused, a California appellate court rules.From Tuesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
Specifically, the Court ruled that California Civil Procedure section 425.13 applies only to health care providers (such as doctors), but does not apply to health care service plans such as Kaiser Foundation Health Plan or Anthem/Blue Cross. [read post]
