Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 301 - 320 of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2017, 5:04 am by Jon Hyman
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that a reasonable jury could conclude that Prieto’s hugs could create a sexually hostile work environment. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
Which Justice Perren begins (after a brief introduction) as follows:"For over 30 years, opinions of the California Courts of Appeal have commented on the frustrating and needless complexity of the Determinate Sentencing Law (DSL). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 36409 (ED CA, March 24, 2011), a California federal district court dismissed a claim against the Secretary of the California Corrections Department complaining that prisons do not employ Wiccan chaplains. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:02 pm by Diana L. Skaggs
The Court of Appeals agreed with Mother’s argument that Family Court should have applied Pennington v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
District Court for the Northern District of California is poised to become the intellectual property equivalent of the O.J. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
Imburgia, holding that the interpretation by the California Court of Appeals of a service agreement that included a binding arbitration provision with a class arbitration waiver is pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act, continues. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Tony DeCristoforo
 The Court of Appeal recently ruled that the plaintiff can proceed with her case and, if she proves the employer did not provide suitable seating, recover PAGA penalties. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:36 pm by Holly Doremus
Salazar and Home Builders Association of Northern California v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As to rounding, the Court of Appeal relied on See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Ultimately, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with the trial court, vacated the Superior Court opinion, and remanded the case for a determination on whether there are remaining issues for appeal. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Ultimately, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with the trial court, vacated the Superior Court opinion, and remanded the case for a determination on whether there are remaining issues for appeal. [read post]