Search for: "CROSSFIT, INC." Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. Zoox
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Zoox, Inc., 2023 WL 5211628 (N.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
512(f) Claim Against Robo-Notice Sender Can Proceed–Enttech v. Okularity
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity, Inc., 2020 WL 6888722 (C.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
512(f) Preempts Tortious Interference Claim–Copy Me That v. This Old Gal
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Selkatz Inc., 2020 WL 9074806 (C.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Releasing Liability: What You Should Know Before Your Business Uses a Release of Liability
19 Jul 2023, 3:13 am by Cari Rincker
“Dangerous” does not have to mean an extreme activity like skydiving, CrossFit, or martial arts, however. [read post]
Food, Farm & Family Law Blog - https://rinckerlaw.com/blog
Anti-Circumvention Takedowns Aren’t Covered by 512(f)–Yout v. RIAA
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
RIAA, Inc., 2022 WL 4599203 (D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
11th Circuit UPHOLDS a 512(f) Plaintiff Win on Appeal–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: Alper Automotive, Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: Warner Records Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? (Spoiler: Not Well)
6 Apr 2019, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Automattic Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Surprise! Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Bored Ape Yacht Club v. Ripps
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: Yuga Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
512(f) Doesn’t Restrict Competitive Gaming of Search Results–Source Capital v. Barrett Financial
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Case Citation: Source Capital Funding Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police Infringement–Sunny Factory v. Chen
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Satirical Depiction in YouTube Video Gets Rough Treatment in Court
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. Maritas
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
BONUS 2: Barz Adventures Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial!
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
Background A refresher: in 1998, Congress created a notice-and-takedown scheme for user-submitted items that allegedly infringe copyright. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/