Search for: "CUMMING v. MAINE, STATE OF" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by jonathanturley
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
CHRISTOPHER CUMMINGS ERIC WEBB, Third‐Party Defendants Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Denying Motion of Third‐Party Defendants, Christopher Cummings and Eric Webb, to Dismiss the Third‐Party Complaint of Mindstream Media, LLC (Doc. 18) This decision addresses whether, in a preference action, a third‐party complaint for indemnification should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Schmidt’s Donald Trump v. the United States report that Mueller was prevented from exploring that avenue by then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.] [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:42 am
  The Court found that the main evidence in support of this claim was exaggerated, and that there were not acts that were sufficiently "exclusive, continuous and notorious" to supplant the ownership of the M family.Read the decision at: Webster v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
’ Notably, although the basis for Proposition 12 is scientifically validated, existing case law (Maine v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm by Prashant Reddy
Sanjeev Kumar Chaswal) that the constitution of the Search-cum-Selection Committee must be in conformity with the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Environmental Protection Agency, where Roberts would have saved the EPA from the state's lawsuit to force it to deal with global warming, and Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Her main regional focus is the United States and Latin America, and her principal areas of interest include violence against women, gender and race discrimination, and immigrants’ rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793; see e.g. [read post]