Search for: "Cable Tv Company v. Federal Communications Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 7:09 pm
In 2007, the Federal Communications Commission found that exclusive contracts between cable companies and owners of multiple-dwelling units (e.g., apartment complexes) cause significant harm to competition and consumers. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:36 pm by Mitch Stoltz
The Federal Communications Commission has a plan to bring much-needed competition and consumer choice to the market for set-top boxes and television-viewing apps. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:39 am by Antitrust Today
Insight also claimed that because the Federal Communications Commission has detailed rules about how cable boxes are to be provided and priced, an antitrust decision by a court could conflict with the FCC’s policy judgment. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:36 pm by Mitch Stoltz
The Federal Communications Commission has proposed to break cable and satellite TV companies’ monopoly over the hardware and software used by their subscribers. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 11 a.m. on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on the constitutionality of the government’s ban on “indecency” on television and radio, in the case of Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
May 14, 2020 Significantly Viewed Local TV Stations – Comments are due with regard to the FCC’s NPRM examining whether to update the methodology for determining whether a TV broadcast station is “significantly viewed” in a community outside of its local television market and thus may be treated as a local station in that community and permitted under FCC rules to be carried by cable systems and satellite operators. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
Aero is arguing that, as the Supreme Court thought that it acted like a cable system and should be treated in the same manner as cable system for all purposes, it should also be entitled to carry the signals of TV stations pursuant to the statutory licence granted to cable systems by section 111 of the US Copyright Act.Sanna Wolk (Associate Professor at University of Uppsala, Sweden and co-chair of AIPPI’s copyright committee) compared the US position with… [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:34 am
  The bill orders that: The Federal Communications Commission shall consider advanced blocking technologies that-- may be appropriate across a wide variety of distribution platforms, including wired, wireless, and Internet platforms; may be appropriate across a wide variety of devices capable of transmitting or receiving video or audio programming, including television sets, DVD players, VCRs, cable set top boxes, satellite receivers, and wireless… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am by David Oxenford
Both Courts focused on the language of Section 111 which defines a cable system as follows: A “cable system” is a facility, located in any State, territory, trust territory, or possession of the United States, that in whole or in part receives signals transmitted or programs broadcast by one or more television broadcast stations licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, and makes secondary transmissions of such signals or programs by… [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Javed Iqbal runs HDTV Corp., a Brooklyn-based company registered with the Federal Communications Commission that provides satellite television transmissions to cable operators, private companies, government organizations and individual customers. ... [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm by LTA-Editor
Circuit also issued a landmark decision on January 15, 2014, overturning several of the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) key net neutrality rules. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
Next Tuesday, the Federal Communications Commission is holding a "workshop" on the issue, as part of the important FCC rulemaking to codify "network neutrality. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Federal Election Commission, 08-205). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:27 pm
 The law required that the FCC solicit public comment on "advanced blocking technology", the next generation of the V Chip, to see if these technologies can and should be extended to video programming other than broadcast television, including online communications, wireless communications (including video delivered to mobile  devices), DVRs and other video recorders, DVD players, and… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Federal Communications Commission (09-901). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:07 pm by Adam Thierer
  The regulatory shenanigans here got started 14 years ago with Section 629 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which included authority for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to meddle in the video equipment marketplace. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:39 am
Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005), the Supreme Court deferred to the Federal Communications Commission’s ruling that, under the Communications Act of 1934, cable broadband providers are “information service providers” and not “telecommunications carriers. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The scheme led to a federal indictment of two of Charter's officers and a cease and desist order by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
  The investors contended that those two companies helped a giant cable TV firm, Charter Communications, inflate artificially its financial staements in order to bolster its stock’s price. [read post]