Search for: "Cahn v State" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 6:47 am by David Oscar Markus
Friend of the District Reuben Cahn argued before the Supreme Court this week in Tapia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:24 pm by David Markus
 Here’s the review from SCOTUSBlog:The first case for argument in the Supreme Court this morning has a very interesting underlying issue: whether a policy of shackling all criminal defendants at pretrial appearances in a federal district court is constitutional.But as United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am by Family Law
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm by Family Law
Professor Naomi Cahn (GW Law) has posted a response to Sveen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:47 am
She was a visiting professor at Georgetown from 1991 to 1993 and in 1998.At GW Law, Professor Cahn teaches courses on family law, trusts and estates, and child, family, and state. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
Some of her recent publications include: * RED FAMILIES V. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:31 pm
Feminist Law Professor Naomi Cahn (George Washington Law School) and June Carbone (University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Law) has posted to ssrn her article Red Families v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:43 pm by jly
Cahn and Carbone’s important new book, Red Families v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 pm by Caitlin Borgmann
In his New York Times op-ed column today, Ross Douthat discusses Naomi Cahn and June Carbone’s book, “Red Families v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:30 pm by Steve Shiffrin
I draw this lesson from discussions in Naomi Cahn and June Carbone’s wonderful new book, Red Families v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
(Apparently, by 2009, stadium facilities must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other comparable state and city laws.) [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:51 am
, and June Carbone and Naomi Cahn's project, Red Families v. [read post]