Search for: "Cain v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 3:59 pm
Cain to discuss the ethical discovery obligations of both federal and state prosecutors—an idea strongly suggested by the American Bar Association in their amicus brief filed in the case. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
Cain contains all briefing. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
As the report relates, “prosecutors have rarely been subjected to disciplinary action by state bar authorities,” even though “state bar disciplinary procedures stand as one of the few – and perhaps the only – means of holding prosecutors accountable for gross misconduct. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:14 am
Cain, 2008 WL 4186883 (E.D.La. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:50 am
In Cain v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Yesterday the American Bar Association filed an amicus brief in Smith v. [read post]
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Malmo-Levine; R. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:25 am
In Cain v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:20 pm
Cain v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Brumfield v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Police Dep’t v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Cain, a capital case from Louisiana. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Walker River Irrigation District (Tribal Water Rights) Fawn Cain, Tanya Archer and Sandi Ovitt v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
Cain (docket 10-8145). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm
Jones (Sentencing)Cain v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm
Jones (Sentencing)Cain v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am
The threshold problem with Judge Cain's opinion in Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Ass’n, 171 S.W.2d 864, 865 (Tex. 1943).8 Cain v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
Cain, 2016 U.S. [read post]
