Search for: "California Building Industry Association v. State Water Resources Control Board" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
State Water Resources Control Board and San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Amicus Brief Waters of the State Rulemaking Proceedings Pending Amendments to Riverside County Mining Ordinance Point San Pedro Road Coalition v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
New Jersey State Parole Board, 2017 WL 1057462 (N.J. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
Of particular concern to the states (as well as many farming and industry groups) are the definitions in the Rule for “tributaries” and “adjacent waters. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The appellate court rejected this argument, following the Supreme Court’s recent decision in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
         GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
Although the various complaints seek multiple forms of relief, they generally ask the courts to declare that the rule is unlawful because it: 1) exceeds the agencies’ statutory authority under the Clean Water Act; 2) violates the 11th Amendment of the Constitution and the Clean Water Act, which preserves the primary role of States in planning the development and use of local land and water resources; and   3) violates the Administrative… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
State Water Resources Control Board (March 30, 2015, B252688) ____ Cal.App.4th___. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 RPI alleged that the authority of the State Water Resources Control Board (“Board”) to protect and manage public trust resources extends to the protection of the described groundwater resource and that the County of Siskiyou (“County”), which has a duty to protect public trust resources, must act to protect and manage the groundwater resource through monitoring, regulating, and… [read post]