Search for: "California Company v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 9,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 10:41 am
On May 3, 2019, in Anthony Ayala v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:07 pm
In Lidow v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Bacardi & Company Limited., April 21, 2022, Collins, D.). [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 10:29 pm
Playground AI LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
In Spratt v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm
Last month, the California Secretary of State appealed the decision by a California Superior Court striking down as unconstitutional California’s board diversity law, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in the State to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:50 pm
After the California Supreme Court's 2006 decision in Dore v. [read post]
When Is an Interest in a California Real Estate Syndicate a “Security” Under State and Federal Laws?
5 Jun 2017, 4:58 pm
Supreme Court decided Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm
The plaintiff then sued the company in California state court, but the case was dismissed again. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
That is the harsh lesson recently imparted by the California Court of Appeal in Boilermakers v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
The decision came in the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Tuesday in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 11:12 am
In Crest v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, other states besides California, including Maryland and New York, have passed laws requiring companies to disclose board diversity statistics. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
In a legal dispute (Aurora S.A. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
Lidow v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:43 am
The case is Howell v Hamilton Meats & Provisions. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 5:26 pm
In East of Eden Cannabis Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
