Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 301 - 320 of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2009, 9:35 am
 The DLSE opined that an employer could properly do this, without violating the salary basis test and without jeopardizing the exempt status of its employees under federal or California law. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:22 pm by HRWatchdog
These numbers do not include the many extortionate demand letters sent to businesses, nor does it include lawsuits filed in state courts. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm by Alexander R. P. Dunn
The ABC test differs markedly from the approach previously used in California—an approach mirrored in the DOL opinion letter and used in a number of other states. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:53 am by Bankruptcy Legal Group
Additionally, debt collection agencies must seize sending letters or making calls to collect unpaid debts from consumers who have filed for bankruptcy protection in the state of California. [read post]
Seyfarth Synopsis: Pay equity and Ban The Box bills lead the list of bills approved to continue their quest (moving to the other house of the California Legislature) to become California law. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:46 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Patrick Taurel, an attorney with Clark Hill and a contributor to Nevada Employment Law Letter, also says that employers have to ensure their workforce is authorized and that the best way to do that is to institute proper I-9 processes. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:46 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Patrick Taurel, an attorney with Clark Hill and a contributor to Nevada Employment Law Letter, also says that employers have to ensure their workforce is authorized and that the best way to do that is to institute proper I-9 processes. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:00 am by Lisa S. Charbonneau
Application to California Employers For California employers, the new DOL Opinion Letter clarifies employer responsibilities – especially after the Ninth Circuit case, Escriba v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm by HR Hero Alerts
We will cover this case in more detail in the next issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:17 am by Anthony Zaller
The post $58.25M Sexual Harassment and Battery Verdict Has Important Takeaways For Employers appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:17 am by Anthony Zaller
The post $58.25M Sexual Harassment and Battery Verdict Has Important Takeaways For Employers appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ceballos, the Supreme Court upheld the power of non-academic government employers to regulate their employees' speech that is pursuant to their employment duties. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
   DHS will not use anemployer's receipt of a no-match letter as evidence to find that it violated the law by knowingly employing unauthorized workers as long as the employer follows the safe harbor rules. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 5:36 pm by Peter Stockburger
California law also requires businesses that suffer a breach of security to disclose the breach to consumers, and in some instances law enforcement, if sensitive information is compromised. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 am
The director of California's Department of Industrial Relations issued an opinion letter clarifying one of the provisions of California's baby WARN Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The new law largely codifies the ABC test adopted in Dynamex, meaning the test would serve as the standard in California for determining employment status. [read post]