Search for: "California Federal Bank, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States, Defendant-cross Appellant" Results 41 - 49 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
US, No. 06-11612 Express consent by counsel suffices to permit a magistrate judge to preside over jury selection in a felony trial, pursuant to the authorization in the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(3). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bennette, No. 06-6696 In prisoner civil rights action alleging deliberate indifference to medical needs and retaliation, dismissal of complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is reversed in part where: 1) the district court erred in dismissing plaintiff's pancreas claim on the ground that defendants were not named or referenced in the grievance he had submitted regarding his pancreas; 2) the district court violated the mandate from a prior appeal by holding the… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Banks, 126 S.Ct. 2572 (2006), held that Mills was not retroactively applicable on collateral review. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
It's an area of law that's evolving very rapidly but primarily through appellate authority, both state and federal. [read post]