Search for: "California Supreme Court and Its Judges from 1987 to Present" Results 1 - 20 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
This is in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This Fifth Circuit ruling is remarkable, not so much for its holding that a Texas man had a qualified right to confront witnesses against him in a hearing to revoke his supervised release, but for Judge Ho's concurring opinion, which is basically an amicus brief addressed to the Supreme Court's pending ruling in the Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:28 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
” In contrast, Judge Stark noted that the district court had focused on PMC’s conduct from 1987 to 1995. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The Supreme Court has explained that a State’s right to investigate suspected crimes justifies its questioning of suspects under oath and other aspects of an investigati [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Fitting some of this jurisprudence within her framework of overentitlement and unjust enrichment, Suk quotes an Irish High Court judge reasoning about what seems to be a counterpart to equitable distribution of property upon divorce. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rahimi, decided today by the Fifth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Cory Wilson, joined by Judges Edith Jones and James Ho: The question presented in this case is not whether prohibiting the possession of firearms by someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order is a laudable policy goal. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Below I will present the law of municipal police, and cover why police have no general duty to protect individuals. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
At the same time, though, it should be noted that Harlan sharply dissented when the Supreme Court refused to grant civil rights protections to Chinese victims of white vigilantes in California. [read post]
Sept. 22, 2021)—that prevented a group of plaintiffs from challenging the approval of a settlement award in a price-fixing case might be on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm by admin
Palmer, the California Supreme Court compared sobriety checkpoints to other administrative inspections, like airport screening searches. [read post]