Search for: "California Water Impact Network"
Results 21 - 40
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
EIR Decisions South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Southern California water war. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
Regents of Univ. of California (1994) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1128.) [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
In her role with USDA, she analyzes important legislative and regulatory issues that may impact the USDA and the Office of the Inspector General. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
When seafood is cleared by the lab, fishing waters will be allowed to reopen. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 5:36 pm
On August 13, 2018, a coalition of consumer advocacy groups responded by arguing “the sky is not falling, as industry suggests” and claimed the business community’s proposed changes would “fundamentally water down” the CCPA’s privacy protections. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Water Replenishment District Of Southern California(2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 943: A 1991 groundwater basin judgment provided the legal framework for a later, 2010 declaration of water emergency. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:41 pm
Mortgage Lenders are grappling with the impact of these orders on their business. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 10:45 am
Effect: (Effective January 1, 2017) This new law requires both local and national background checks to be completed by transportation network companies. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:31 am
On digital discrimination, EFF applauds the Commission for adopting a disparate treatment as well as disparate impact standard. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:12 am
Today, an eye-popping 76% of American Internet users consider internet service to be as important as water and electricity in their daily life. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
(California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 2:27 pm
(Buzz is also a member of the PPIC Water Policy Center’s research network.) [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 5:36 pm
On August 13, 2018, a coalition of consumer advocacy groups responded by arguing “the sky is not falling, as industry suggests” and claimed the business community’s proposed changes would “fundamentally water down” the CCPA’s privacy protections. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:53 pm
So much of the younger demographic is unaware of how rapid population growth has impacted California’s economy, our environment, our public schools, health care facilities, prisons, highways, wetlands, biodiversity, water resources, energy consumption and state and national parks – virtually every aspect of life. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The court also rejected the argument that the lead agency improperly relied upon mitigation measures to fit the project into the exemption (an approach rejected in Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
Construction zones and areas impacted by fire are particularly vulnerable, in part because of damage to networks of tree and plant roots that help secure the soil. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
” The Legislature has concluded that these policies “have a disparate impact on Black individuals as these policies are more likely to deter Black applicants and burden or punish Black employees than any other group. [read post]
