Search for: "California v. Button"
Results 21 - 40
of 511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
‘After all, if you were wearing a contraption around your waist that by the mere push of a button in someone else’s hand could make you defecate or urinate yourself,’ the brochure asks, ‘what would that do to you from the psychological standpoint? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Last Friday, Bloomberg Law had: California Can Change Name of UC Hastings Law School, For NowA California trial judge tentatively allowed the state to change the name of UC Hastings College of the Law under legislation created in response to founder Serranus C. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:42 am
The California courts rejected Viking’s argument, relying on well settled California law (from a case named Iskanian v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:29 am
These cases follow a string of federal California precedent, including the recent Ninth Circuit case Oberstein v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Justice Scalia has a well-known opinion (his concurrence in California v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:23 am
Andino v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
” California law offered two cases, both from intermediate appeals courts: Long v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
LINKImportantly, the Supreme Court did not rule that the trial court's decision to allow the family to wear the buttons did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
Here's a follow-up to my commentary on the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
If only to entertain myself.And when I did, for a moment, I thought I had accidentally clicked the wrong button. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
James Otero, sitting in the Central District of California, who showed genuine concern over the one-sidedness of RIAA litigation. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Elektra v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:55 am
The case is Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
There's only a single published opinion from the Ninth Circuit and California appellate courts today. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:38 pm
In Rutledge v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:10 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
The case is that of Naruto v Slater, where PETA sued British photographer David Slater for copyright infringement, claiming to be acting on behalf of Naruto the monkey. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Paz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:14 am
Case Citation: Sarchi v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:56 pm
California: Hotel Worker Can Sue Hotel for Sexual Assault by Non-Employee Trespasser On October 26, 2017, a California Court of Appeal ruled in M.F. v. [read post]
