Search for: "California v. Camp"
Results 1 - 20
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:33 am
On February 1, 2023, the California Supreme Court granted a petition to review the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Camp v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:35 am
The recent case of Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:28 pm
In a statement earlier Tuesday, University of California President Michael V. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
As we wrote about previously here, in October 2022, the Sixth District of the California Court of Appeal in Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Although prior California decisions have approved neutral rounding systems, Camp v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:20 am
A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Camp v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 1:24 pm
While Boise v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
City of Boise (9th Cir. 2019) 920 F.3d 584 (“Martin”) and Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Martis Camp Community Association v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:18 am
Wright v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:03 am
The decision, issued in Jones v. [read post]