Search for: "California v. Carter"
Results 141 - 160
of 373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
Jerry Brown and state judges for "the New California. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
There were no vacancies on the Court during Jimmy Carter's single term, and Bill Clinton got only two appointments during his first term. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
[Revisting Kastl v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
The courts in B.C. have previously explored this issue in Carter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:38 pm
Uzyel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Daum v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Carter concluded that in the employment context, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Gentry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
In the 1994 case of Carter v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
Could we see a Twitter employee sitting in California, or Ireland, deciding whether the British Prime Minister is telling the truth? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
In Venezuela v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
In Cohen v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Both justices were appointed in the same year to federal circuit courts of appeals in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 10:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ariz. 2013); Carter v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
In the other decision, Judge David Carter dismissed MGA's anitrust counterclaim against Mattel, ruling it was barred by, among other things, the doctrine of res judicata under California law. [read post]
