Search for: "California v. Christensen"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Grand Christensen has posted “Using Consent to Expand Tribal Court Criminal Jurisdiction,” forthcoming in the California Law Review, on SSRN. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:30 am
Christensen v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
” Christensen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
§1030 in U.S.A. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007).According to Williams, because Officer Hendricks lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the car, the handgun and heroin were fruits of an illegal stop and should have been suppressed.See generally Wong Sun v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
The Ninth Circuit has handed down United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
Including this neat little tidbits: "Shapiro . . . directed a group of those associated with Laing to go to Laing's residence in Palm Springs, California, and there to obtain 12 duffel bags, each containing $500,000 in cash that Shapiro knew or should have known had been unlawfully obtained . . . and some of that money was used to post bail for Laing and to pay the fees of Shapiro and the Christensen Firm. . . . . [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
Granite Rock Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 6:52 pm
Darin Christensen (Univ. of California, Los Angeles - Luskin School of Public Affairs) & David K. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
The analysis was prepared by my colleagues, Doug Christensen, Zeb Curtin and Courtney DaCosta. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:57 am
In Ayotte v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
On Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit heard argument in Facebook v. [read post]
