Search for: "California v. Cooks"
Results 1 - 20
of 653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
In Cook v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:00 pm
Despite recent legislation tightening the enforceability of no-contest clauses in California, the court in Cook v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Great job.P.S. - Lest one think that all opinions are like Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
"Bleeding Dodger Blue" focuses on the work of Susman Godfrey attorney Victoria Cook, who, at the time she was called into the McCourt v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:59 pm
And, as an added bonus, these issues arise in the context of a constitutional challenge to California Family Code Section 7962, which codified the preexisting California cases that found gestational surrogacy contracts enforceable. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
In another similar case, DJO, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
Cooke. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:05 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
Avi Casino Enterprises and California v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
In Swarthourt v Cooke, Supreme Court No. 10-333, the Court granted certiorari on a rather boring question concerning habeas corpus law: “Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on its view that the state court erred in applying the state-law standard of evidentiary sufficiency governing state parole decisions. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
See Cook v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm
Reliance on the California case Leighton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:54 am
., v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:43 am
This was exactly the issue in the 2012 California Court of Appeals case of People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
Several Northern California Courts have recently denied petitions for habeas corpus. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
So why are California and other states muscling their way into provision of private pensions? [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 3:24 pm
California - After a daunting thirty-two month patent infringement lawsuit between Apple Inc. and HTC, the two tech giants announced a confidential 10-year licensing agreement that will cover both current and future patents held by both companies. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
