Search for: "California v. EPA"
Results 41 - 60
of 681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule[25] requiring facilities that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to report their direct GHG emissions.[26] About 8,000 facilities are required to report.[27] This rule also requires fuel suppliers to report the emissions attributable to the fu [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Hall's holding on state sovereign immunity in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
Ehrman, Southern Methodist University School of Law, and Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law EPA’s regulatory authority is limited by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “waters of the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:02 pm
EPA, Biden v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
EPA and national vacaturs under Section 706. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
A few states, notably California, generally prohibit post-employment noncompetes. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
EPA, in which the Court expressly named and relied on the major questions doctrine for the first time. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
Supreme Court Narrows Scope of EPA Authority Under the Clean Water Act in Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
Q: West Virginia v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:35 pm
EPA. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Supreme Court decision Sackett v EPA overturns a decision from the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am
“EPA has done its homework and crafted a set of rules that fit within the constraints of West Virginia v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
California (Attorney Fees; Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) Kanam and Pilchuck Nation v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
That’s why EPA authorized California to mandate some sales of zero emission vehicles as early as 1993, before the Supreme Court had even given EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases. [read post]
