Search for: "California v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
EPA also granted California two waivers approving recent California Air Resource Board regulations aimed at reducing transportation emissions. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm
In Midwest Ozone Group v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
During oral argument in Department of Education v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:07 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., State of California v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., State of California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
As U.S. financial institutions assess their ESG risks, opportunities, policies and procedures for 2023, key considerations include the numerous significant ESG developments in 2022—in particular, recent proposals and initiatives announced by financial regulators with respect to climate-related risk management and disclosures—and overarching regulatory, political, investor and litigation trends. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
EPA restores California waiver to regulate new cars. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:35 am
Because of West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
California Governor Gavin Newsom, for example, signed a bill protecting abortion recipients and providers in California from lawsuits from other states that outlaw abortion or that may make it illegal for a person to travel to California to receive an abortion. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 6:57 am
The Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (21-454) Argued on October 3, 2022 This case goes back over a decade when an Idaho couple sought to develop a property lot that the EPA later determined was in a wetland area, which the EPA said it could regulate under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
