Search for: "California v. Gomez"
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
Neither Rule 68 nor the 19th century railroad tax cases California v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
See Gomez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:53 pm
Gomez then reentered the country illegally. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:31 am
Vanhooser v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:02 am
Gomez-Mendez, No. 05-50729 (5-14-07). [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
For the past 30 years, this status has been part of the equation and most likely affected an innumerable number of would-be personal injury claims.A Brief History of the SituationThis entire situation goes back to 1986 when a California appellate court case known as Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
According to People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
We published an article a few months ago that highlighted the efforts of California personal injury lawyers Max Halpern and John Michael Montevideo from Gomez Trial Attorneys. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:34 am
Narvaez-Gomez, No. 05-50501 (6-6-07). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
(See Lent v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 2:04 pm
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Monday in US v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
But that's essentially what the Ninth Circuit holds.Sure, in 2007, the Ninth Circuit held that the Central District of California could validly shackle all pretrial detainees appearing before a magistrate, without any particularized showing of good cause (e.g., that the particular detainee might be a threat). [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:20 pm
According to California Highway Patrol officials, Gomez was riding a 2004 Yamaha V-Star motorcycle between slow traffic, traveling at about 30 mph when he struck the catering truck, fell off his vehicle and was run over by another truck. [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:20 pm
By a single vote, the en banc panel holds unconstitutional the Southern District of California's routine practice of shackling every single defendant who appears in court for pretrial proceedings.Judge Kozinski's majority opinion is, in my view, masterful. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 12:50 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Well a recent appellate decision provided such an example.........Gomez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Well a recent appellate decision provided such an example.........Gomez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Gomez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:51 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
A practice especially troubling, even beyond the history and importance of the Great Writ, given the requirement of Article VI of the California Constitution, which allows commissioners the power only to exercise "subordinate" judicial duties. [read post]
