Search for: "California v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 9:20 am by Steven G. Pearl
The decision follows two other decisions regarding the same arbitration agreement already before the California Supreme Court: Sanchez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:18 am
Roger Craig Green (Temple University - James E. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
This is the same arbitration agreement that is at issue in two other cases currently pending in the California Supreme Court:  Sanchez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm by The Recorder
The Green Bag's California honorees also include Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski in the concurrences and dissents category, U.S. v Pineda-Moreno; Stanford professor Jack Rakove, books, Revolutionaries: A New History of the Invention of America; Stanford professor Barbara Babcock, short articles, Clara Shortridge Foltz; and Assistant Attorney General Tony West, miscellaneous, Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support of… [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by Mike
Several judges in the Northern District of California have recently released orders, among them: Elder v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Once a year, the Green Bag’s impressive board of advisers for exemplary legal writing selects 20 or so works to honor with publication in the Green Bag Almanac & Reader. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
They will appear in the 2014 edition of the the Green Bag Almanac & Reader. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Urziceanu (2005) 132 CA4th 747, 773, 33 CR3d 859. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:52 am by tortsprof
Kyle Graham has a Green Bag piece that involves Saint Peter attempting to resolve the conundrum from the famous California case: Who Shot Charles Summers?. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:29 am by Shari Shapiro
If successful, either of these regulations would do more to change the green industry than any legal challenge to LEED's legitimacy (see the continued coverage of the Gifford v. [read post]