Search for: "California v. Jones" Results 201 - 220 of 1,308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
  After all, the money flows the way it does regardless.That said, try as I might -- and I've tried hard -- I can't exactly tell what Justice Jones is trying to say in this opinion.If her point is that the trial court awarded $1.4 million in fees and costs to California and that wasn't an abuse of discretion given these facts, yep, right on. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings The IPSO Committee released seven rulings this week: 06319-19 Docherty v Evening Times, no breach after investigation. 09224-19 Laws v Daily Star, no breach after investigation. 05601-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v Mail Online. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
: An Analysis of the California Consumer Privacy Act and Its Effects on Nationwide Data Protection Laws, 11 Hastings J. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Mother Jones has an article by Madison Pauly, “She Said, He Sued: How libel law is being turned against MeToo accusers”. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:47 am by INFORRM
The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal of the case however findings under the Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act we not in the planiffs favour and the dismissal was ultimately affirmed. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The BBC had a piece “Alex Jones ordered to pay $100,000 in Sandy Hook defamation case”. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
Simpson, Jim Jones, Ike Turner and, last but not least, Simon Cowell. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 07239-19 Heneghan v coventrytelegraph.net, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 05741-19 Grant and Pitts v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01212-19 Ashley v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation  Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 24 October 2019 there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Morgan… [read post]