Search for: "California v. Lucero"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 11:02 am
Judge Lucero, sitting by designation from the Tenth Circuit, concurs and writes a separate opinion. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
The two recent opinions, Lucero v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing on California Law Banning Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements
16 Sep 2022, 10:19 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
In Lucero v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
[Indeed, federal district courts have rejected Iskanian’s conclusions in Lucero v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:30 am
Roberta V. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
” (NLRB v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Adams, No. 09-56902 (Graber, J., with Lucero [10th Cir.], J; dissent by Kleinfeld, J.)The Ninth Circuit affirmed the grant (Carney, D.J.) of a California state prisoner's § 2254 petition. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Those are potentially winning arguments, and you could see why a system might well adopt them.But Judge Lucero doesn't agree. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Chamber of Commerce of the US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Lucero of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
The Court relied on the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:36 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker presided over the 2010 two-week bench trial of Perry v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
Lucero and Jerome A. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"Political Affiliation," with No Express Definition: California, V.I., Shreveport, Wayne County (Mich.), Orange County (N.C.) [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of California, et al. [read post]